HP3000-L Archives

April 1999, Week 2

HP3000-L@RAVEN.UTC.EDU

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Neil Harvey <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Neil Harvey <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Mon, 12 Apr 1999 07:16:55 +0200
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (14 lines)
Isn't it because MicroFocus Cobol compiles to some kind of tokenised
intermediate code that needs to be "interpreted" at run-time, and does not
compile to native machine-executable code?

Neil


Richard wrote:-

Guess what?  At a recent get together of HP-UX platform users of Microfocus
Cobol with Oracle Pro*cob (for a particular Unix application vendor), what
strategy did we all agree on as avoiding trouble?  When you install patches
(e.g. libc), relink Oracle and recompile the PRO*cob and Pro*C applications!

ATOM RSS1 RSS2