HP3000-L Archives

April 2005, Week 2

HP3000-L@RAVEN.UTC.EDU

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Patrick Burleson <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Patrick Burleson <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Fri, 8 Apr 2005 16:23:05 -0400
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (60 lines)
On Apr 8, 2005 3:58 PM, Shawn Gordon <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
> At 12:21 PM 4/8/2005, Bill Shanks wrote:
> >Shawn condescends and adds a little misdirection of his own (Denys would be
> >proud of you):
> >
> >"thank you, you've now just confirmed what started this conversation.  Wirts
> >incorrect and inflammatory statements about the state of stem cell
> >research.  I was wondering if anyone would pick up on it.  So 1 point for
> >figuring it out and -1 point for not knowing that an embryo is a fertilized
> >egg."
> >
> >As long as we're keeping score, that's -1 for childishly whining "Wirt did
> >it first!", -1 for doing the same thing he did (hasn't anyone every told
> >you that 2 wrongs don't make a right?), and -1 for not knowing the
> >difference between an embryo and a baby.
> >
> >Now, just a question: eventually some of the embryos you are so adamant
> >about not "killing" will have to be destroyed anyway.  Would you then
> >charge the person(s) that destroyed them with murder?  Will you say they
> >have to be maintained for eternity?
> >
> >I also find it incredibly illogical that those who want to protect these
> >embryos are usually in favor of the death penalty.  So much for the
> >sanctity of life.
>
> I'll leave out the mindless rambling and address this because it's the most
> typical liberal talking point.  A baby is totally innocent, someone on
> death row is not, they've been convicted of a heinous crime by a jury of
> their peers, and have exhausted about 20 years of appeals.  I guess that
> since you equate an innocent potential child with a violent criminal, then
> it explains your point of view, which if I understand correctly is to kill
> babies via abortion, kill potential babies, but let violent criminals live.
>
> >* To join/leave the list, search archives, change list settings, *
> >* etc., please visit http://raven.utc.edu/archives/hp3000-l.html *
>
> Regards,
>
> Shawn Gordon
> President
> theKompany.com
> www.thekompany.com
> www.mindawn.com
> 949-713-3276
>
> * To join/leave the list, search archives, change list settings, *
> * etc., please visit http://raven.utc.edu/archives/hp3000-l.html *
>


Shawn Gordon! I thought I recognized that name! From theKompany. To
take this even more off-topic, did you guys ever finish Kapital? I
finally gave up on Linux for my desktop, but I always wondered what
the status of Kapital was.

Patrick

* To join/leave the list, search archives, change list settings, *
* etc., please visit http://raven.utc.edu/archives/hp3000-l.html *

ATOM RSS1 RSS2