I think that the point is that OT: posts can be weeded from the list by
setting your preferences accordingly. POT: posts are not and therefore
should not be used.

It's likely that Paul Guy didn't get the original post mentioning POT:
because it was properly posted with an OT: subject line. (It also means that
he probably didn't get your response just now).


----- Original Message -----
From: "Johnson, Tracy" <[log in to unmask]>
To: <[log in to unmask]>
Sent: Monday, November 01, 2004 1:37 PM
Subject: Re: [HP3000-L] OT: Re: POT: Well-reasoned political discourse


Paul Guy wrote:

> When where the rules changed that OFF-Topics (OT) posts would
> be changed
> to Political Off Topics (POT)?

There was a reply that mentioned it about a month or so ago,
a few of us thought it was funny enough to follow through
with it.

-- It is NOT an officially sanctioned prefix. --

But it DOES show you didn't read THAT posting.

BT


Tracy Johnson
MSI Schaevitz Sensors

* To join/leave the list, search archives, change list settings, *
* etc., please visit http://raven.utc.edu/archives/hp3000-l.html *

* To join/leave the list, search archives, change list settings, *
* etc., please visit http://raven.utc.edu/archives/hp3000-l.html *