Subject: | |
From: | |
Reply To: | Senn, Bruce |
Date: | Mon, 24 Sep 2001 14:46:50 -0400 |
Content-Type: | text/plain |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
I agree. I don't think any of us thought we were "voting."
And from my point of view the most important piece, namely the ability to
know the remaining time on the UPS, isn't even part of the project. I'd
rather know that the UPS will last another so many minutes, shut down my
applications and databases, and let the system crash.
Clearly, a personal $.02.
Bruce.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Bruce J. Senn Phone: (518) 388-6664
Senior System Manager FAX: (518) 388-6458
Union College E-mail: [log in to unmask]
Schenectady, NY 12308 WWW: http://www1.union.edu/~sennb
----------------------------------------------------------------------
> -----Original Message-----
> From: John Clogg [mailto:[log in to unmask]]
> Sent: Monday, September 24, 2001 12:01 PM
> To: [log in to unmask]
> Subject: Re: New CI command:SHUTDOWN
>
>
> I don't think it is appropriate to consider the suggestions received as
> votes. I think most people, having seen that their favorite idea had
> already been offered, chose not to respond. I think the best approach
would
> be to gather the suggestions on a ballot and solicit votes for everyone's
> favorite.
* To join/leave the list, search archives, change list settings, *
* etc., please visit http://raven.utc.edu/archives/hp3000-l.html *
|
|
|