HP3000-L Archives

April 1999, Week 3

HP3000-L@RAVEN.UTC.EDU

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
B T Vikram Kumar <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
B T Vikram Kumar <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Thu, 15 Apr 1999 09:25:26 +0530
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (33 lines)
Hi Jay,

I remember to have seen  the following additional dates also for testing
(not sure of the resoning of each).
08/21/99, 09/10/99, 02/28/2000, 03/01/2000, 12/31/2000, 01/01/2001

Regards,
Vikram

Jay Willis wrote:

> This subject may have been discussed before, and, if so, I apologize.
> But there may be some on the list (that would include me), who missed it
> and may benefit from it.
>
> I am in the process of testing my programs for Y2K-compliance and was
> wondering what dates are being used to test against. This is the list of
> dates that I have come up with:
>
> 09/09/99...............all 9's
> 12/31/99...............last date of this millenium
> 01/01/2000...........first date of the next millenium
> 01/02/2000...........2nd date of the next millenium
> 02/29/2000...........leap year date
> 10/10/2000...........1st 8-character date
> 02/29/2004...........leap year date
>
> If you can think of any other dates that should be tested against, I'd
> appreciate you're sharing it with us.
>
> Thanks,
> Jay

ATOM RSS1 RSS2