> Paul writes:
>
> > If good 'ol Saddam is developing the means to deliver quantities of VX gas
> at
> > distance or decides to pack a shipping container full of the stuff along
> > some explosives to disperse it, say in downtown DC, or does get the goodies
> > needs to make a nuclear device then I would MUCH prefer to deal with a
> > terrorist who *at best* can hijack a airliner and ram it into a building
> > terrorist who can nuke a city or carry out coordinated Sarin gas attacks in
> > truckload quantities across the nation.
>


> The problem with a unilateral, pre-emptive strike against anyone


Bravo Wirt! You must have xray vision because not even I can see where I
suggested a "unilateral, pre-emptive strike" was in order. Or possibly did I
miss something in an earlier post that suggested this was the topic?

I was simply speaking as to the size of terrorist I preferred to deal with, not
when or how.

Paul

* To join/leave the list, search archives, change list settings, *
* etc., please visit http://raven.utc.edu/archives/hp3000-l.html *