HP3000-L Archives

April 1996, Week 2

HP3000-L@RAVEN.UTC.EDU

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Bill Lancaster <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Bill Lancaster <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Thu, 11 Apr 1996 15:19:41 -0700
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (22 lines)
Gavin writes:
 
>Does anybody have any idea what percentage of Image databases have logging
>enabled?  My impression has always been that it is a fairly small number.  I
>think this was certainly true back on MPE/V, but have more people started
>using logging in recent years?  From experience at Quest, I would wild-guess
>that less than 20% of important databases use logging.
>
>G.
>
My experience at Lund, and before, would echo your guess.  I have seen
estimates that Image logging takes 8 percent overhead, but I never tested it.
 
Bill
---
Bill Lancaster
Lancaster Consulting
(541)926-1542 (phone)
(541)917-0807 (fax)
[log in to unmask]
http://www.proaxis.com/~bill

ATOM RSS1 RSS2