HP3000-L Archives

February 2001, Week 4

HP3000-L@RAVEN.UTC.EDU

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Tom Brandt <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Tom Brandt <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Tue, 27 Feb 2001 11:36:46 -0500
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (25 lines)
At 07:26 AM 2/27/2001 -0800, Doug Becker wrote:
<snip>
>One aspect that is never touched upon in this article or others is what
>happens when Java can't handle the load and the system is rewritten in
>Cobol. This happens more frequently than one would be led to believe by
>the media. Java is in some ways like a garbage disposal. Garbage disposals
>at first seemed like the be-all and end-all solution. No more
>heavy-lifting required. Then the plumber after changing out the unit and
>retrieving your fingers advises you not to put bones, large quantities of
>vegetables, or non-food items in the disposal * it just wasn't built for that.
>
>http://www.sunworld.com/swol-04-1998/swol-04-cobolconversion.html

Is Java's inability to handle heavy loads due to the language itself, or is
it due to the way it is executed via bytecode interpreted/executed by the JVM?

Can a Java program compiled to a NMPROG be just as capable as a COBOL program?

--------------------------------
Tom Brandt
Northtech Systems, Inc.
313 N. 1st Street
Ann Arbor, MI 48103
http://www.northtech.com/

ATOM RSS1 RSS2