Subject: | |
From: | |
Reply To: | |
Date: | Tue, 16 Oct 2001 13:09:51 +0100 |
Content-Type: | text/plain |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
Hi fellow listers,
Back in October of last year I reported a problem when performing disc I/O
intensive processing on HP's 12H AutoRaid. At the time I promised to let you
know when we had solved the problem and what OUR final solution was. Well
here it is.
"We replaced the 12H (with 12 * 9.1 SE's) with 5 * 18.2 LVD's."
The result? Most of our batch jobs are now twice as fast. The only ones that
have not improved are the CPU intensive ones.
DISCLAIMER (please read):
1) This solution worked for 'US', it [may/may not] work for 'YOU'.
2) The 12H 'IS NOT A BAD PRODUCT', it just was 'NOT SUITABLE FOR OUR NEEDS'.
The thoughts, comments, and opinions expressed herein are mine. They do not
reflect those of my employer, Hewlett-Packard, our hardware/software
supplier, nor anyone else.
regards,
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
|Robert W.Mills (Systems Development Manager) |
|Windsong Services, St. Mary Cray, ENGLAND |
|Tel : +44 (0)1689 870622 x3005 |
|Fax : +44 (0)1689 899026 |
|Email: [log in to unmask] |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
* To join/leave the list, search archives, change list settings, *
* etc., please visit http://raven.utc.edu/archives/hp3000-l.html *
|
|
|