HP3000-L Archives

August 2000, Week 3

HP3000-L@RAVEN.UTC.EDU

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Jim Phillips <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Jim Phillips <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Mon, 21 Aug 2000 11:58:34 -0400
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (29 lines)
Recently I wrote (in response to David Burney's question about performance
penalty (if any) for debugging mode in Cobol):

> Hmmmmm.  I also would like to know the answer to this.  We use the same
> method.  Although anecdotal evidence suggests that their is no performance
> penalty (at least, I haven't noticed one yet!), I would be interested in
> seeing some hard numbers on this.

Okay, so here's some hard data.  It appears that there is some performance
penalty associated with the DEBUGGING code.  One run of a program that reads
600,000 records from an Image dataset shows a cpu usage of 406.089 seconds
with debug code and 361.347 without the debug code, which is an increase of
44.742 seconds or 12.4%.

More testing to follow...


Jim Phillips                            Manager of Information Systems
E-Mail: [log in to unmask]     Therm-O-Link, Inc.
Phone: (330) 527-2124                   P. O. Box 285
  Fax: (330) 527-2123                   10513 Freedom Street
  Web: http://www.tolwire.com  Garrettsville, Ohio  44231

Jim Phillips                            Manager of Information Systems
E-Mail: [log in to unmask]     Therm-O-Link, Inc.
Phone: (330) 527-2124                   P. O. Box 285
  Fax: (330) 527-2123                   10513 Freedom Street
  Web: http://www.tolwire.com  Garrettsville, Ohio  44231

ATOM RSS1 RSS2