HP3000-L Archives

August 2000, Week 3

HP3000-L@RAVEN.UTC.EDU

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Conrad Whittall <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Conrad Whittall <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Wed, 16 Aug 2000 13:41:39 -0400
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (29 lines)
On Tue, 15 Aug 2000 15:30:24 -0700, Gary Sielaff <[log in to unmask]>
wrote:

>I am getting conflicting reports on what tier the 928 and 929
>belong to.  HP (telesales) told me they are both tier 3 or 320 what
>ever that means.  Cognos says 928 is a 320 and 929 is a 340.
>I.E. 928 cognos upgrade from my 937 is 4k and the 929 cognos
>upgrade from my 937 is 24k.
>Can anyone shed a little more light on this?
>Mystified in Moses Lake
>Gary

Sorry about the confusion...I think your sales rep might have mis-read the
table that we have provided.

As others have pointed out the 928 is in HP's Option 310 tier, while all of
the 929KS models are in HP's Option 330 tier. Also, the 979KS servers were
reclassified earlier this year as Option 330 machines, down from the
previous 340 level.

These are the classifications that Cognos use for our FOS-based licensing
model.

Best regards,
Conrad

Conrad Whittall
Marketing Manager, Application Development Tools, Cognos Incorporated

ATOM RSS1 RSS2