HP3000-L Archives

October 1999, Week 1

HP3000-L@RAVEN.UTC.EDU

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Neil Harvey <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Neil Harvey <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Tue, 5 Oct 1999 17:25:42 +0200
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (40 lines)
This was also one of our few "real" y2k problems....

At least it's consistent.
I can live with the confusion, as long as I am consistently confused.

Regards

Neil



-----Original Message-----
From: Scott Root [mailto:[log in to unmask]]
Sent: 05 October 1999 03:54
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: !HPYEAR


To the people of the list,

Okay, so I was doing a final bit of Y2K testing last week and had the
!HPYEAR variable in a jobstream that renames some files. I realize that
HPDATE variables drop any leading zeros but did not expect this for the
year.
Poor assumption on my part.
Example:       !HPMONTH!HPDATE!HPYEAR  used on 01/01/99 returns 1199.
When I used this format with a system date of 01/01/00 and 01/01/01 the
variables returned 110 and 111 respectively. Somewhat confusing at first
glance.

Anyone have any thoughts or comments.
Should I have any concerns?

Were running iX ver 60
TIA for the input.

Scott Root
Prescom Industries Inc.
703-905-4551

ATOM RSS1 RSS2