HP3000-L Archives

December 2000, Week 2

HP3000-L@RAVEN.UTC.EDU

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Donna Garverick <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Donna Garverick <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Fri, 8 Dec 2000 09:20:29 -0800
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (30 lines)
Joe Berliner wrote:

> I'm very new to this posix stuff so please bear with me as I ask what's
> probably a dumb question:

tain't no dumb questions with this crowd :-)

> Since we are running these posix background processes as jobs, could the
> abortjob command be made a little smarter to terminate these jobs properly?
> Can the os determine if the job to be aborted is running a process that
> needs to be "gently laid to rest" versus "terminated with extreme prejudice"?
>
> It would be easier for all of us if we could manage all jobs using the same
> set of commands. Also, as was mentioned in an earlier post, this is an
> issue for those who manage their batch environment through third party job
> management systems.

this is an intriguing question -- especially noting the constraint in the last
paragraph.  any comments?        - d

--
Donna Garverick     Sr. System Programmer
925-210-6631        [log in to unmask]

"Unix _is_ user friendly.
It's just very selective about who its friends are.
And sometimes even best friends have fights."

>>>MY opinions, not Longs Drug Stores'<<<

ATOM RSS1 RSS2