Subject: | |
From: | |
Reply To: | VANCE,JEFF (HP-Cupertino,ex1) |
Date: | Tue, 26 Mar 2002 09:36:28 -0800 |
Content-Type: | text/plain |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
I meant to "reply all" but only replied to John:
-------Original Message-----
From: VANCE,JEFF
Hi John,
> >Now, since the hardware is identical for MPE & HP-UX, why
> >can't HP use the same EOL parameters for MPE as HP-UX?
>
> Excellent questions! Why indeed? It would seem the issue is
> the staff it takes to keep enhancing the OS.
Yes.
> The freeze idea would certainly seem to
> make the later EOL more viable. One consideration might be
> that the N-class
> machines are not expected to be on the price list beyond 10/03,
Correct for both CSY and for the HP-UX division.
> and HP doesn't want to invest the effort to support newer boxes.
Correct. We don't have the staff to get MPE to run on the newer
PA-RISC boxes, and the HP-UX team is large enough to do this,
and more!
> In that sense, a freeze really doesn't work.
Correct.
Jeff
* To join/leave the list, search archives, change list settings, *
* etc., please visit http://raven.utc.edu/archives/hp3000-l.html *
|
|
|