HP3000-L Archives

March 2002, Week 4

HP3000-L@RAVEN.UTC.EDU

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
"VANCE,JEFF (HP-Cupertino,ex1)" <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
VANCE,JEFF (HP-Cupertino,ex1)
Date:
Tue, 26 Mar 2002 09:36:28 -0800
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (37 lines)
I meant to "reply all" but only replied to John:

-------Original Message-----
From: VANCE,JEFF

Hi John,

> >Now, since the hardware is identical for MPE & HP-UX, why
> >can't HP use the same EOL parameters for MPE as HP-UX?
>
> Excellent questions!  Why indeed?  It would seem the issue is
> the staff it takes to keep enhancing the OS.

Yes.

> The freeze idea would certainly seem to
> make the later EOL more viable.  One consideration might be
> that the N-class
> machines are not expected to be on the price list beyond 10/03,

Correct for both CSY and for the HP-UX division.

> and HP doesn't want to invest the effort to support newer boxes.

Correct. We don't have the staff to get MPE to run on the newer
PA-RISC boxes, and the HP-UX team is large enough to do this,
and more!

> In that sense, a freeze really doesn't work.

Correct.

 Jeff

* To join/leave the list, search archives, change list settings, *
* etc., please visit http://raven.utc.edu/archives/hp3000-l.html *

ATOM RSS1 RSS2