Bob Ceculski wrote:

> "Bill Todd" <[log in to unmask]> wrote in message news:<[log in to unmask]>...
>
>>"David Froble" <[log in to unmask]> wrote in message
>>news:3CD0CAA5.1010202@tsoft-inc.com...
>>
>>>Hey Bill, do you do anything besides watch for Rob's posts?  I never get
>>>
>> to jump
>>
>>>on him first.
>>>
>>Actually, it's Rob's posts that seem to jump out at me, and responses have
>>become almost automatic since his material doesn't change much.  Of course,
>>that can give my responses a certain sameness as well...
>>
>>Just to break the monotony, I'm thinking of making up a Letterman-style 'top
>>ten' list of reasons why we're all still breathlessly awaiting the public
>>debut of Itanic 2.  At this rate, EV7 and Hammer may not only be
>>embarrassingly faster, but embarrassingly faster to market as well.  And
>>(while on the subject of Itanic 2's wondrous performance if and when), I was
>>surprised to notice recently that USIII has made it up to 610 in SPECint2K
>>performance:  wouldn't it be amusing if after all the "Just wait for
>>McKinley!" hype over the past year Itanic *still* turned out to be at the
>>back of the pack?
>>
>>- bill
>>
>
> but when EV8 shows up masquerading as itanic 3 ... your mouth will
> drop open ...
>


But it isn't going to happen except in the phantasy
world occupied by some posters to this group.

Soap box
Hyde Park Corner
Sunday Morning
Be there.

Regards
Andrew Harrison

* To join/leave the list, search archives, change list settings, *
* etc., please visit http://raven.utc.edu/archives/hp3000-l.html *