Subject: | |
From: | |
Reply To: | |
Date: | Thu, 11 Jan 1996 10:29:01 -0500 |
Content-Type: | text/plain |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
On Thu, 11 Jan 1996, M Gopalakrishnan wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Thanks for your suggestions.
>
> Jon Diercks wrote:
>
> > > Also RAW causes non-printable characters to appear as '.'.
> >
> > Whoops! When did this sneak in? I think that filtering of non-printable
> > characters would be a good option to have, but I don't think it should be
> > folded into the ;RAW option.
>
> I agree with your suggestion of RAW implies 'unprocessed'. Note that
> this does not apply to page breaks (set ;page=0 to print binary data
> continuously).
>
> Having said that, how important is it to have the non-printable character
> filtering option?. Our SR back log does not show any request on this issue.
> So, I guess no one felt a real need for this.
>
> Thanks and regards,
>
> Gopi ([log in to unmask])
>
I agree - If they want dots for unprintable characters let them use
FCOPY, RAW shoud be just that - NO change to the data. If somebody tries
to PRINT a binary file, shame on them. The opposite of RAW (default)
should be FMT.
NMD
|
|
|