HP3000-L Archives

March 2001, Week 3

HP3000-L@RAVEN.UTC.EDU

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
John Clogg <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
John Clogg <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Thu, 15 Mar 2001 10:40:13 -0800
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (54 lines)
Scott,
The second sentence in your reply contradicts the first.  Some clarification
seems to be in order.

-----Original Message-----
From: Scott Swartzell [mailto:[log in to unmask]]
Sent: Thursday, March 15, 2001 10:02 AM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: Memory upgrade


Paul,

You will definitely have problems if you mix memory
sizes on the same carrier.  If you add a second carrier
and redistribute the memory, so each carrier has 2x128
and 1x256, you should be alright.

Scott
>
> We currently have 4 128Mb memory modules and want to upgrade our total
> memory to 1Gb. I was considering two 256Mb modules but dont know whether
to
> go with just another four 128Mb.
>
> What are the implications of mixing different size memory modules -
> performance for instance(dont you get a high interleave factor with the
same
> capacity?) Could any problems be overcome by having an addition memory
> carrier and balancing the memory between the two?
>
> Any thoughts or comment are welcome
>
> TIA
>
> Paul Thompson
> Spark Response
>
> _____________________________________________________________________
> This message has been checked for all known viruses by Star Internet
delivered
> through the MessageLabs Virus Control Centre. For further information
visit
> http://www.star.net.uk/stats.asp
>


--
---------------------------------------------
Scott Swartzell   IT | Information Technology
             590-2152
8/3 - Mt Belford (14,197') and Mt. Oxford (14,153')
5 down, 49 to go.........

ATOM RSS1 RSS2