Subject: | |
From: | |
Reply To: | |
Date: | Fri, 25 Apr 1997 22:19:31 -0500 |
Content-Type: | text/plain |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
Jeff Kell wrote:
> Gavin Scott wrote:
>
> > So I still vote for not being able to get at UNIX style names from
> > FOPEN. We're not raising the wall between Posix and MPE, we're just
> > lowering the ground on the Posix side of the wall a bit.
>
> While we're mentioning the "wall", let's extend the analogy a bit.
The
> current directions (web servers, Samba, Java, etc) are pressing
against
> yet another barrier, the "Posix/Unix" wall. Granted it's more of a
> child restraint gate than a wall, but it's still an obstacle. So now
> we have MPE vs Posix vs Unix. Perhaps the latter should be SCO :-)
>
> Jeff
>
The current name thing, I believe, for Unix is X/Open Spec-1170
(standardizes 1,170 APIs across multi-vendor Unix). So the gates (or
holes) in the wall are for MPE <-> Posix <-> X/Open.
Richard Gambrell
|
|
|