HP3000-L Archives

April 2006, Week 3

HP3000-L@RAVEN.UTC.EDU

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Michael Baier <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Michael Baier <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Tue, 18 Apr 2006 01:48:14 -0400
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (65 lines)
On Mon, 17 Apr 2006 10:02:57 -0500, Denys Beauchemin 
<[log in to unmask]> wrote:

>This is beginning to feel like the Twilight Zone.  Saddam good, Bush bad.

Denys, you are so wrong.
We all know that Saddam is and was very bad and a mass-murderer.
However Bush/Cheney told/tell lies for their reasons to invade Iraq.
Nobody complains about the invasion of Afghanistan, you might notice.
However the reasons for the attack of Iraq were very different from 
the "fantasies" told.
That is the point I am trying to make.
Would Senate have voted for the invasion if all the facts were on the table?
Would the American have re-elected B/C if the truth was known or B/C would 
have shown their true face?

Michael



>
>The 300,000 figure comes from the number of bodies found in mass graves
>around Iraq so far.  It is suspected that the actual figure will be a lot
>higher.  This does not include a couple million Iranians and the Kuwaitis
>civilians.
>
>Denys
>-----Original Message-----
>From: HP-3000 Systems Discussion [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf
>Of Bruce Collins
>Sent: Friday, April 14, 2006 12:04 PM
>To: [log in to unmask]
>Subject: Re: [HP3000-L] OT: Cheney Aide Says Bush OK'd Leak
>
>John Lee wrote:
>> I thought it was pretty well accepted that Iraq's regime was responsible
>> for some 300,000 murders over the past few years?  We haven't even begun
>> to count others.
>
>Just out of curiosity, where do you come up with that figure?
>
>The chemical bombing in 1988 killed about 5,000 Kurds (according to fox 
news
>
>http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,105708,00.html ). Since that was
>probably the high point I would guess that the number killed by the Iraqi
>regime in the past few years (prior to the invasion) would be much less.
>
>In fact, the number of civilians killed in the 3 years prior to the 
invasion
>
>would likely be less than the 30,000 or so killed in the 3 years since.
>
>Bruce
>
>* To join/leave the list, search archives, change list settings, *
>* etc., please visit http://raven.utc.edu/archives/hp3000-l.html *
>
>* To join/leave the list, search archives, change list settings, *
>* etc., please visit http://raven.utc.edu/archives/hp3000-l.html *
>=========================================================================

* To join/leave the list, search archives, change list settings, *
* etc., please visit http://raven.utc.edu/archives/hp3000-l.html *

ATOM RSS1 RSS2