HP3000-L Archives

February 2003, Week 2

HP3000-L@RAVEN.UTC.EDU

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
fred White <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
fred White <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Wed, 12 Feb 2003 10:50:30 -0700
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (31 lines)
On Wednesday, February 12, 2003, at 10:00 AM, Mark Wonsil wrote:

>> Great post. Hope that it persuades at least some of the "carnage
>> hawks".
>
> Now I'm not trying to be a smart-ass, but before we are told that
> because
> the terrorist are no match (for the U.S., Israelis, Russia, etc.), we
> must
> understand and accept that they will become "carnage hawks" (car bombs,
> suicide bombs, DC-9s, etc.).  Who decides when is it OK to be a
> "carnage
> hawk" and by what factors?
>
> This question is genuine and not an attempt to irritate.
>
> Mark

Thanks.

I didn't suggest that it's ever OK to be a "carnage hawk". It seems to
me that the folks that make the decision (right or wrong) that it's OK
to be a "carnage hawk" are the "carnage hawks".

Perhaps someone else has a better answer to your question?

FW

* To join/leave the list, search archives, change list settings, *
* etc., please visit http://raven.utc.edu/archives/hp3000-l.html *

ATOM RSS1 RSS2