Subject: | |
From: | |
Reply To: | |
Date: | Fri, 15 Nov 1996 10:43:40 -0800 |
Content-Type: | text/plain |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
True, but only if you don't get a rogue process that chews up ALL
of the disk space. I'd prefer the process to come down, than
the entire system. For the system set, I relax it a little
more to 90/10 though.
Regards,
Michael L (Perception is more important than Reality) Gueterman
Easy Does It Technologies
email: [log in to unmask]
http://www.editcorp.com
voice: (509) 943-5108
fax: (509) 946-6179
--
----------
From: Bill Lancaster[SMTP:[log in to unmask]]
Sent: Friday, November 15, 1996 9:49 AM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: 4 GB Disc Drives
Debbie G. said:
>Good job Fred, except whoops..... <pardon me>
>
>Make that a:
>volutil> NEWVOL MPEXL_SYSTEM_VOLUME_SET:MEMBERx x 75 75
>
>... or use 80/80 for Permanent and Transient space, but never 100% for
>permanent. Great way to crash a system eventually. I'm sure you realize
>users are like kids and money -- they use all resources available without
>understanding the impact of what they're doing. Go 100% on permanent
>space
>without room for transient space and you don't have to worry about
>performance
>anymore ... the system's down anyway. ;-)
>
Actually,
I have always done 100,100 with nary a problem. You can go to 100%
permanent and still leave
room for transient by just not using all the permanent. I have configured
hundreds of systems this
way and never seen a problem.
You will *not* crash your system this way.
Bill
---
Bill Lancaster Lancaster Consulting
(541)926-1542 (phone) (541)917-0807 (fax)
[log in to unmask] http://www.proaxis.com/~bill
|
|
|