HP3000-L Archives

September 2000, Week 4

HP3000-L@RAVEN.UTC.EDU

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Jim Gilbert <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Jim Gilbert <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Fri, 22 Sep 2000 09:28:50 -0700
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (25 lines)
I believe Shawn is right, HP only provided RPG as a migration path for
people to
move from IBM to the 3k.  The year I spent working with RPG on an ix machine
(shudder) it was RPGII.

>At 08:29 AM 9/22/2000, Tom Murray wrote:
>>Can anyone out there provide information on the main differences between RPG
>>for the HP3000 (MPEiX) and AS400. For example, would the HP version be
>>equivalent to RPG I, RPGII, RPGIII, or RPGIV or none of these?
>>                                  Thanks in advance for any info.
>>                                                   TOM
>
>RPG II and KSAM were originally built IIRC to get people from IBM and were
>pretty much totally compatible with their IBM counterparts.  I don't
>believe any attempt was made to keep RPG up to date with III and 400
>
>Regards,
>
>Shawn Gordon
>President
>theKompany.com
>www.thekompany.com
>949-713-3276
>

ATOM RSS1 RSS2