Subject: | |
From: | |
Reply To: | |
Date: | Fri, 22 Sep 2000 09:28:50 -0700 |
Content-Type: | text/plain |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
I believe Shawn is right, HP only provided RPG as a migration path for
people to
move from IBM to the 3k. The year I spent working with RPG on an ix machine
(shudder) it was RPGII.
>At 08:29 AM 9/22/2000, Tom Murray wrote:
>>Can anyone out there provide information on the main differences between RPG
>>for the HP3000 (MPEiX) and AS400. For example, would the HP version be
>>equivalent to RPG I, RPGII, RPGIII, or RPGIV or none of these?
>> Thanks in advance for any info.
>> TOM
>
>RPG II and KSAM were originally built IIRC to get people from IBM and were
>pretty much totally compatible with their IBM counterparts. I don't
>believe any attempt was made to keep RPG up to date with III and 400
>
>Regards,
>
>Shawn Gordon
>President
>theKompany.com
>www.thekompany.com
>949-713-3276
>
|
|
|