Subject: | |
From: | |
Reply To: | |
Date: | Mon, 16 Sep 2002 10:52:12 -0400 |
Content-Type: | text/plain |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
On Fri, 13 Sep 2002 23:17:06 -0500, Peter Chong <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
> "John R. Wolff" <[log in to unmask]> wrote in message
news:<[log in to unmask]>...
>>
>> The Iraq problem needs to be addressed before it can become an even
bigger
>> problem.
>
>Hmmm, Iraq problem or petrolium company problem?
>Syria sells a Iraq oil on 1/2 price to black market under the trading
>al queda infomation to US.
>The petrolium companies loosing big profit for that, now it have to
>stop oneway or the other, cost on producing nothern british oil is
>much higher than gulf oil too.
>
>I Just wonder, Why they wait for 10+ year to replace the Iraq regime?
>(de javu)
>IIRC, in the 60's, one of science magazine, in 21st century, we
>commercialized
>hydrogen fision energy. I guess that's wrong.
>
>Half century ago, the same reason, Hitler chased Brithish for gulf
>oil...
In a newspaper I read the following question:
"Is this a personal vendetta between the Bush-family and Saddam?
Wants George W. to finish what was missed 10yrs ago.?"
* To join/leave the list, search archives, change list settings, *
* etc., please visit http://raven.utc.edu/archives/hp3000-l.html *
|
|
|