Subject: | |
From: | |
Reply To: | |
Date: | Thu, 31 May 2001 13:25:30 -0700 |
Content-Type: | text/plain |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
Re:
> Can someone tell me of any potential pitfalls or problems when using the
> MAXTAPEBUF & INTER (together or separately) options during a STORE command?
I wouldn't be surprised if the backup is a tad quicker with
MAXTAPEBUF, but I haven't done any timings.
IIRC, an HP engineer in Europe did some tests on this a couple of
years ago, but I can't find my copy of his results.
However, caveats:
INTER will create a tape set that is harder to restore,
both for ordinary restores and for damaged tape restores.
The speed reduction is probably not worth those costs.
MAXTAPEBUF will create a tape that ordinary tape utilities
cannot correctly read (e.g., to check the tape or to
copy the tape (possibly including STORCOPY)).
Our X-OVER product, and our free TAPETAPE program,
have the ability to read such tapes, however.
Stan
Stan Sieler [log in to unmask]
www.allegro.com/sieler/wanted/index.html www.allegro.com/sieler
* To join/leave the list, search archives, change list settings, *
* etc., please visit http://raven.utc.edu/archives/hp3000-l.html *
|
|
|