Subject: | |
From: | |
Reply To: | |
Date: | Wed, 25 Feb 1998 03:18:26 -0500 |
Content-Type: | text/plain |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
|On Tue, 24 Feb 1998 02:27:37 GMT, Ken ([log in to unmask]) wrote:
|
|>Does IMAGE-SQL properly handle datasets that have fields with an
|>OCCURS description. Actually they are PIC X(120) fields that MUST be
|>broken into twelve PIC X(10) fields.
|
|Well, if what you mean is "Does Image/SQL successfully handle Image
|repeating fields" the answer is "yes". But the fields must be defined
|as (in your example) 12X10 in the Image schema. If you have a field
|that is defined as X120 in the schema, then Image/SQL cannot be made
|to define (or redefine) this field into discrete fields (AFAIK). If
|I am mistaken in this belief, I'm sure someone will correct me. :-)
IMAGESQL.PUB.SYS automatically splits up repeating fields into
separate fields when you attach a database to a DBE. This won't help
you with your PIC X(120) field. But no problem, you can split the field
manually using the following split command in the IMAGESQL utility:
>>set dbe YOURDBE
>>set base YOURBASE
>>sp dataset.field120 into field1:x10,field2:x10,...,field12:x10
Type "help split" in IMAGESQL for more details. Hope this helps.
Best regards...
Andreas Baronick
|
|
|