Subject: | |
From: | |
Reply To: | |
Date: | Wed, 12 Nov 1997 16:07:53 +0000 |
Content-Type: | text/plain |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
> Date: Wed, 12 Nov 1997 14:27:15 -0500
> Reply-to: Daniel Levite <[log in to unmask]>
> From: Daniel Levite <[log in to unmask]>
> Subject: JCW limits for sessions
> To: [log in to unmask]
> does anyone know the limits for session JCWs and VARs?
I ran an experiment:
setvar i, 1
while true do
setvar i!i, i
setvar i, i+1
endwhile
It took 10338 variable (with small names and integer values) to fill
up the table (which had 161 variable (different sizes and shapes) to
start with. That is a total of 10499 variables.
I did a second experiment:
setvar i, 1
while true do
setvar biglongname!i,
"zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz
zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz"
setvar i, i+1
endwhile
In this case it took only 5400 variables to fill up the table (a
total of 5561 entires).
So the bottom line as I see it is that it depends on the variables
and values as to haow many variables will fit in one variable table.
As the person responsible for making sure MPE/iX tables are size
"appropriately", my question is:
Why do you want to know? How many vairables/JCWs do you need per
session? Help me understand the real impact of the table being too
small (if any).
Scott McClellan
___ ___ _________ Hewlett-Packard
/_ /| /_ /| /_______ /| Commercial Systems Division
|##| | ##| ||########| | 19447 Pruneridge Ave
|##| |_##| ||##| |_##| | Cupertino, CA
|##|/__##| ||##|/__##| |
|########| ||########|/ E Mail: [log in to unmask]
|##| | ##| ||##| | Phone : (919) 969-7870
|##| | ##| ||##| | Fax : (919) 969-7871
|##| | ##|/ |##|/
-- -- -- Voice Mail : 447-6067
|
|
|