>
> "Rudderow, Evan" <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
>
> > BTW, does anybody know why windows applications work with some winsocks and
> > not others?
>
> My guess would be that they didn't code it to the same 'standard'.
[snip]
 
I recall a article that reported on testing winsock against a published
(supposedly the official - whatever that means) standard. The only stack that
I remember passing with no errors was WRQ's and the list of tested ones
even included Microsoft's. Right now, I cannot remember where I read that, but
I bet the good folks at WRQ can!
 
--
-- - - - Speaking for myself and not necessarily anybody else - - - - - -
Richard Gambrell        | Internet: [log in to unmask]
Mgr. Tech. Services     | POT:      504-483-7454     FAX: 504-482-1561
Xavier University of LA | Smail:    7325 Palmetto, New Orleans, LA 70125