HP3000-L Archives

August 1999, Week 2

HP3000-L@RAVEN.UTC.EDU

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Bob Comeau <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Bob Comeau <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Wed, 11 Aug 1999 13:24:16 -0300
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (33 lines)
We just updated to express 7 and I was under the impression that FTP would
now handle non-standard MPE files more elegantly, including spoolfiles.

KSAM files now transfer nicely but I see little change in the handling of
spoolfiles, not that my testing was exhaustive and perhaps my expectations
were a little high.

I would like to be able to PUT Oxxx.OUT.HPSPOOL and have it appear on the
other side in the spooler as Oyyy.OUT.HPSPOOL owned by whoever I logged on
as
or maybe 'Oxxx.OUT.HPSPOOL with similar ownership.  The put command appears
to execute and transfers nnn bytes without any error.  Problem is the file
is nowhere to be found at the other end.  I suspect it is being created as
temporary file Oxxx.OUT.HPSPOOL under the programmatic session, and cannot
be
closed as a permanent file with that name since the session is not in that
account.  Explains the disappearance, but not the lack of an error message.

We have a been using a workaround involving copying the spoolfile,
transferring
the copy, manually logging on the other system, prefixing the received copy
with
spacing control, and then send that to the spooler on the receiving system.
This is done via a couple UDC's but still seems like a lot more work than it
should be.

We don't have a real printer on the source system, and no network printers,
hence the song and dance.

Any suggestions for a smoother transfer of spoolfiles?

Bob

ATOM RSS1 RSS2