John after Wirt:
> >Of course IBM is paying $14.5 billion less for
> PricewaterhouseCoopers than HP
> >initially offered for the company. However, if HP wanted to,
> Arthur Andersen
> >could probably be picked up for a song nowadays.
>
> Which might be a savvy move.
Why pay? Maybe HP could provide a "haven" for those looking to escape the
unfortunate guilt by association. I thought I had read about AA partners
across the Country planning to spin off or get acquired. Could save
themselves several $Billion...
* To join/leave the list, search archives, change list settings, *
* etc., please visit http://raven.utc.edu/archives/hp3000-l.html *