Tim,
I slightly disagree.
This is not between conservatives and liberals but
between without common-sense and people with common-sense.
We (as society) protect the idiots(people without common-sense not mentally
handicaped) too good.
Just my opinion.
On Tue, 6 Jan 2004 09:30:56 -0500, Tim Cummings
<[log in to unmask]> wrote:
>After reading this article, it is obvious that the First Amendment should
be
>taken literally. In every case that Eugene states it is not free speech
>that should be enforced, it is the other laws being broken that should. I
>someone makes a death threat or is disturbing the peace, those laws should
>be enforced. Those are not covered by free speech.
>
>As far as special interests and unions, I think that should be covered
under
>"equal protection under the law".
>
>Liberals have twisted free speech to their benefit for so long that they
>forgot what it was all about. Now that conservatives are using the twisted
>law to their benefit, liberals are having a hissy fit.
>
>Tim
>
>Comments are my own not my employers
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: Denys Beauchemin [mailto:[log in to unmask]]
>Sent: Monday, January 05, 2004 9:22 PM
>To: [log in to unmask]
>Subject: [HP3000-L] Eugene on NRO
>
>
>http://www.nationalreview.com/comment/volokh200401050906.asp
>
>
>Denys
>
>* To join/leave the list, search archives, change list settings, *
>* etc., please visit http://raven.utc.edu/archives/hp3000-l.html *
>
>* To join/leave the list, search archives, change list settings, *
>* etc., please visit http://raven.utc.edu/archives/hp3000-l.html *
* To join/leave the list, search archives, change list settings, *
* etc., please visit http://raven.utc.edu/archives/hp3000-l.html *
|