HP3000-L Archives

November 1999, Week 2

HP3000-L@RAVEN.UTC.EDU

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Reply To:
Date:
Sun, 14 Nov 1999 16:31:42 GMT
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (44 lines)
I am would purchase the liscense from HP.  Cost in learning for me is never a
issue.  It always pays off in the long run.  Everything from the HP box to my
quad Processor Compaq Proliant that I have in my home is all for learning
experience.  Hey if I have to go to a 9000 series HP box if it is more cost
effective since they usually are already liscened for HPUX then so be it.
Weather I have to trade my 3000 or purchase the 9000 outright it doesn't
bother me.  Hey would be neat to also tag MPE to my learning experience as
well, never know when I may need it..

Thanks,

Dean
[log in to unmask]


In article <[log in to unmask]>, Lars
Appel <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
>Dean wrote...
>
>>I've been told MPE/ix is a dieing out
>
>This is an urban legend for many years now. And will probably continue to be.
>
>
>>(-not the group I should have said this in.....(-rope around neck-) )
>
>HP3000-L is (fortunately) not a hostile environment. Like MPE/iX itself ;-)
>
>
>>but now that I have the 927 just can seem to stop playing with MPE/ix...
>
>Yes, stop playing. MPE/iX is not a toy. It's intended for real work :->

>
>:-) ;-) :-) Lars
>
>
>PS: I installed HP-UX on a 9x7 machine loong ago, but why would one really
>want to do that? Putting technical (non-)issues aside, there might be legal
>issues from the licensing point of view (I am not a lawyer; and definitely
>not speaking for hp.com here). For learning Unix, it might be cheaper and
>easier to get a PC and install Linux...
>

ATOM RSS1 RSS2