 
| Subject: | |
| From: | |
| Reply To: | [log in to unmask][log in to unmask], 26 Apr 1999 13:47:49 +0200566_- Hi, I have a problem with SambaIX 0.7c on MPE5.5: First I have created a directory in posix /SAMBA/SHR named bianca, edit the smb.conf to add this share and finally I have mapped this directory in the W95-Explorer. After copying some files, directories and subdirectories to this share from my PC with the Explorer, I get the problem, that I can't remove the directories and subdirectories. I tried it on the posix shell with the rm -r command as manager.sys but permissions are denied. What is the reason? Can anyone help me? [...]46_26Apr199913:47: [log in to unmask] |
| Date: | Thu, 22 Apr 1999 10:04:19 +0200 |
| Content-Type: | text/plain |
| Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
Tony,
I do not have HP insider knowledge but
* APACHE (and not Netscape Fasttrack) will be shipped with MPE/iX 6.0 and
also supported, as far as I understand the communications arround this
subject,
* APACHE is widely used on different platforms and has a good support on
the web,
* ODBC and other methods for data warehousing and e-commerce are available
for HP3000's as well (but not all for free),
* MPE/iX is not a dead end!
And I fully agree that it's better to access the original data (in a safe
manner) than to extract data to a Micro$oft NT or whatever machine -
nothing is older than an data extract of a live system!
I added the HP3000 newsgroup to my reply although send privately - there
may be other opinions or better knowledge on this subject.
Best regards, Andreas Schmidt, CSC, Germany
[log in to unmask] on 04/21/99 06:00:40 PM
To: Andreas Schmidt/HI/CSC
cc:
Subject: Re: Is Apache 1.3.3 safe for a production box.
Hello Andreas,
Thanx for the information. I feel confident with
installing and testing the software now. We are
wanting to view several basic reports, and I think it
will work well for that, but what about using it for
full blown company wide e-commerce. I've heard that
the 3000 makes a bad web server from several people
but hey haven't provided any details as to why. It
seems like it would be easier to display reports on
the same machine that created them as opposed to
FTP'ing them to a $Mickysoft machine running a web
server. It also seems like HP wouldn't take the time
to support Apache if it wasn't going to be a viable
web server alternative. Is there some insider
information that everyone else knows but me?
Is my view too simplistic?
Thanx again,
--- [log in to unmask] wrote:
> now doubt about it: Yes, it is safe!
>
> I run it since nearly one year without problems,
> accepting the MPE
> restrictions for cgi programming in posix ...
>
> Best regards, Andreas Schmidt, CSC, Germany
>
>
>
>
>
> [log in to unmask] on 04/21/99 02:59:25 PM
>
> Please respond to [log in to unmask]
>
> To: [log in to unmask]
> cc: (bcc: Andreas Schmidt/HI/CSC)
> Subject: Is Apache 1.3.3 safe for a production box.
>
>
>
>
> Hello All,
> We want to install and play with the Apache
> software.
> Unfortunatly, the only machine available is our
> production box.
> Would you folks feel safe installing and testing the
> Apache 1.3.3 web server software on your production
> box? I'm not concerned about advanced
> functionality.
> I just want to be able to view certain reports and
> $stdlists online, without having to worry about the
> machine crashing, runaway process', Etc.
> Thanx
> ===
> __
> Tony Newton
>
_________________________________________________________
> Do You Yahoo!?
> Get your free @yahoo.com address at
> http://mail.yahoo.com
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
===
__
Tony Newton
_________________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com
|
