At 11:47 AM 4/12/02 -0700, PAUL,GUY (HP-Boise,ex1) wrote:
/snip

>Even so, am I to understand the message: No dissent in the boardroom?  No
>dissent in the lunchroom?

I don't think the issue regarding the leaked voice mail message is as
much a concern about a dissent, but rather an unauthorized release of a
private voice message between executives simply because the individual
happened to either have access to electronic files or perhaps gained access
through some other means. This is an issue of privacy and
potentially abuse of one's role/responsibility within an organization.

It's interesting that the assumption is it was indeed a stolen voice
message and not the possibility that the reporter or someone else who knew
the exec's phone number had guessed/derived his password and recorded the
message that way....

Bet all exec's have updated their passwords... :-)

* To join/leave the list, search archives, change list settings, *
* etc., please visit http://raven.utc.edu/archives/hp3000-l.html *