HP3000-L Archives

October 1996, Week 4

HP3000-L@RAVEN.UTC.EDU

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Reply To:
Date:
Mon, 21 Oct 1996 09:25:41 -0700
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (30 lines)
<all intervening posts snipped>

Mark continued:

>and I'll continue with a <plug alert>:

> We have a customer that is using DLT in production with Backup+ and has
> balanced his devices across multiple SCSI channels such that the bus
> contention noted in Lee's case is not present. With that in mind, he is
> seeing 20Gb per hour to the single drive. In Lee's original post, he
> states that the drives shared the same channels as the disks. Still a
> very good performance figure considering no balancing. So, with multiple
> drives, it is entirely possible that Lee's 88Gb could be backed up in
> slightly over an hour, completely unattended. Now when you consider
> these performance numbers with Delta Backup, I would say there is a
> significant leap in backup technology.

> Check out http://www.orbitsw.com for our white papers on DLT.

> </plug alert>

Mark:

For the record, the DLTs don't share a channel with any disks - the two
DLTs reside on one SE SCSI channel by themselves.  If we decide to go
production with this, we'll most surely purchase additional drives and
device adapters.

Lee

ATOM RSS1 RSS2