Subject: | |
From: | |
Reply To: | Black, Cory |
Date: | Fri, 3 Sep 1999 16:20:29 -0500 |
Content-Type: | text/plain |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
"common sense legal" jumbo shrimp army intelligence they all go together.
-----Original Message-----
From: Stan Sieler [mailto:[log in to unmask]]
Sent: Friday, September 03, 1999 3:20 PM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: Y2K and Software Code
Re:
> > Some guy named Dick Mills has an interesting idea...
>> "If we had a National Software Code, NSC, we could use the same
>> common sense legal approach for software as we do in making
>> bridges and buildings."
...
> "I don't think so, Mr. Mills"
I also see problems with such a code. I well remember listening
to the problems of one building owner (who was doing a major
remodel) ... he pointed out that the building code was rife with
contradictory requirements, and it was up to the inspector to decide
which one to enforce each day.
> as necessary. I shudder at the thought of having an NSC review
> for everything I do on top of that!
I'd much rather have some kind of "visible source" requirement, which
would allow for peer review ... without the NSC requirement.
--
Stan Sieler [log in to unmask]
http://www.allegro.com/sieler/
|
|
|