HP3000-L Archives

September 1999, Week 1

HP3000-L@RAVEN.UTC.EDU

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
"Black, Cory" <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Black, Cory
Date:
Fri, 3 Sep 1999 16:20:29 -0500
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (34 lines)
"common sense legal"  jumbo shrimp  army intelligence  they all go together.

-----Original Message-----
From: Stan Sieler [mailto:[log in to unmask]]
Sent: Friday, September 03, 1999 3:20 PM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: Y2K and Software Code


Re:

> > Some guy named Dick Mills has an interesting idea...
>> "If we had a National Software Code, NSC, we could use the same
>>  common sense legal approach for software as we do in making
>>  bridges and buildings."
...
> "I don't think so, Mr. Mills"

I also see problems with such a code.  I well remember listening
to the problems of one building owner (who was doing a major
remodel) ... he pointed out that the building code was rife with
contradictory requirements, and it was up to the inspector to decide
which one to enforce each day.

> as necessary.  I shudder at the thought of having an NSC review
> for everything I do on top of that!

I'd much rather have some kind of "visible source" requirement, which
would allow for peer review ... without the NSC requirement.

--
Stan Sieler                                          [log in to unmask]
                                         http://www.allegro.com/sieler/

ATOM RSS1 RSS2