HP3000-L Archives

January 1999, Week 3

HP3000-L@RAVEN.UTC.EDU

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
MMRI CS ListServ <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
MMRI CS ListServ <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Thu, 21 Jan 1999 11:50:55 -0600
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (32 lines)
We have 280 gig of disk in our user volume set mirrored which results in 140
gig of data.  I've heard that you shouldn't have more than 80 gig per volume
set otherwise you will experience performance problems and it takes longer
to recover from a disk failure.

We are planning to break up our volume set into 3 volume sets at HP's
advice.  We've had tremendous performance problems due to bottlenecks at the
transaction manager.  If break the data up into 3 volume sets, we will, in
theory, have 3 transaction managers to share the workload.  I've actually
moved all files off the master disk (using MPEX) to other disks and built
big empty files on the master to prevent any user files from being written
to the master.  Doing  this improved our system response significantly.  I
hope it will continue to hold us over until April when money is available
again!  (But, I doubt it.)

Kara Strunk
[log in to unmask]
Data Systems Manager
Maritz Marketing Research Inc.


                -----Original Message-----
                From:   RON HORNER [mailto:[log in to unmask]]
                Sent:   Thursday, January 21, 1999 11:28 AM
                To:     [log in to unmask]
                Subject:        Volume Sets

                How many drives can you have in a volume.  Is there a max
number?

                Later

ATOM RSS1 RSS2