Subject: | |
From: | |
Reply To: | |
Date: | Mon, 5 Jan 2004 10:36:08 -0700 |
Content-Type: | text/plain |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
On Monday, January 5, 2004, at 09:33 AM, Brice Yokem wrote:
> No; the "autonomous region" of "Kurdistan" which we were told was a
> model
> of successful democracy for the region. I very much doubt that the
> Kurds
> encouraged Al Qaida, they probably didn't know, but it isn't evidence
> for
> a link to the Saddam Hussein regime because its writ did not run
> in the area. The "no-fly" and "exclusion" zones kept his forces out.
>
> -----------------------
>
> In the world of espionage, it is hard to be certian of anything.
> I maintain there was a link. All of those terrorist groups are
> loosly connected. I think after 9-11, Iraq tried to distance
> themselves from bin Loudmouth, but I doubt Iraq had anything to
> do with the actual planning of 9-11.
If it's "hard to be certain of anything", how come you're always so
certain?
FW
The fact that a believer is happier than a skeptic is no more to the
point than the fact that a drunken man is happier than a sober one. --
George Bernard Shaw (1856 - 1950)
* To join/leave the list, search archives, change list settings, *
* etc., please visit http://raven.utc.edu/archives/hp3000-l.html *
|
|
|