HP3000-L Archives

June 1997, Week 1

HP3000-L@RAVEN.UTC.EDU

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Bill Lancaster <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Bill Lancaster <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Thu, 5 Jun 1997 13:51:58 -0700
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (23 lines)
Hi,

At 01:41 PM 6/5/97 -0700, Lee Gunter wrote:
>EMC Symmetrix arrays use FW-SCSI connections to the HP3000, and are
>configured using either the DARRAY device ID, if you're running MPE/iX
>5.0 PP6 (minimum) or the SYMMETRIX ID if you're running 5.5 PP1 or
>better.  Performance gains for us were significant - particularly for
>batch processes.  Disk service times average 10-20 ms compared to 25-60
>ms for our Cascade disk arrays (C225xHA).  We still run a mixed DASD
>environment, but we will eventually migrate most, if not all, of our
>volume sets to Symmetrix disk.
>

One key thing to keep in mind about Lee's performance improvements is
that he migrated from the Cascade disk arrays (as he said) which have
nowhere near the performance of more recent disk drives.  Most newer
disk drives have disk service times in the mid-teens to mid-twenties
(in milliseconds) whereas with the EMC's you will probably average
in the 8-12 millisecond range.  Still a great improvement, but not
as dramatic as what Lee experienced.

Bill Lancaster

ATOM RSS1 RSS2