HP3000-L Archives

November 1997, Week 3

HP3000-L@RAVEN.UTC.EDU

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Reply To:
Date:
Wed, 19 Nov 1997 15:00:12 CST
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (33 lines)
On Wed, 19 Nov 1997 13:09:42 -0700, Glenn Cole wrote:
|Glenn asks:
|> Is IA-64 the same as PA-8000?
|
|Gavin gives the simple answer:
|> No.
|
|So, let's make the question a bit tougher. ;)
|
|Is IA-64 a superset of PA-8000?

The folks at Allegro (or whatever name they're using today :) are not
being overly helpful this time, are they?  ;)

IA-64 is the first chip which will be (is being?) produced as a result HP
and Intel's joint effort to develop a successor to both the HP-PA and x86
processor lines.  I believe it has been known as the Merced processor, but
these days IA-64 is the name generally used for it.

One of the things I think I know about it (meaning that I'm not sure of it)
is that it will have a completely new instruction set.  It's expected to
be able to emulate HP-PA and x86 instructions at speeds comparable to native
execution on the native processors in the same way that HP-PA boxes could
execute classic (CM) 3000 code at speeds even faster than the old classic
boxes could achieve.
--
Jeff Woods
[log in to unmask] at Unison Software
[log in to unmask]   at home  [PGP key available here via finger]

"Lobbyists, n. pl., Political lounge lizards who practice their seductive arts
 in the halls of Congress" --  from "The Cynic's Dictionary" by Rick Bayan

ATOM RSS1 RSS2