Subject: | |
From: | |
Reply To: | |
Date: | Fri, 7 Dec 2001 13:16:37 -0600 |
Content-Type: | text/plain |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
>>>>> Peter da Silva writes:
> Does this mean Windows is going to set up some real protection domains
> between subsystems,
Don't know about this...
> abandon the practice of having every application load all their DLLs
> into a common %systemroot%,
Didn't they already develop this capability in the O/S? (Getting
applications to use it is another issue...)
> and so on? Or does it just mean that Microserfs are going to get
> yelled at a bit more if they seem directly responsible for some
> security alert.
I don't know -- it's kind of hard to remember what you were going to
yell about after waiting an interminable time on hold for
support... ;)
> Of course, it could just be setting things up so that when the
> number of security alerts on Microsoft start dropping as security
> firms sign up to Microsoft's NDA-is "Full Disclosure" alternative,
> he can say "see, we said we'd improve security and we did". When all
> they've done is improve their spin control.
Gee, if that works, maybe they can do something with Congress? 8-)
--
David Masterson dmaster AT synopsys DOT com
Sr. R&D Engineer Synopsys, Inc.
Software Engineering Sunnyvale, CA
* To join/leave the list, search archives, change list settings, *
* etc., please visit http://raven.utc.edu/archives/hp3000-l.html *
|
|
|