HP3000-L Archives

February 2008, Week 2

HP3000-L@RAVEN.UTC.EDU
Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
Migration Database Choice
From:
Tom Hula <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Tom Hula <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Tue, 12 Feb 2008 08:42:22 -0500
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (11 lines) 
Going to Windows Server from the HP3000 (say it isn't so), does anyone have any 
strong opinions about going to Eloquence as opposed to, say, M$ SQL?
Arguably, going to Eloquence would make migrating a simpler proposition.
But does it represent somewhat of a dead-end when so many are going to M$ SQL?
But then I have also heard that I would be taking a performance hit going to M$ SQL.
There will be a purchased application that will already be using M$ SQL, if that
makes any difference.

* To join/leave the list, search archives, change list settings, *
* etc., please visit http://raven.utc.edu/archives/hp3000-l.html *

ATOM RSS1 RSS2