Ken Sletten wrote:
> You may be right about renaming & links.  But I would
> still say that HP should ship QUERYNM as QUERY
> on the next release.  If you still want to send CM QUERY
> on MPE/iX systems, then send that as QUERYCM.
>
> I.e.:  QUERYNM has been out of beta a long time now.
> The default on MPE/iX should be NM when a fully
> supported NM version is available.........
 
Because of the time that QUERYNM has been out, I would agree with Ken.  I
know before coming to HP, I did the same thing with NM programs as HP did
with QUERY, until I was sure of two items.  The first was technical: was
the program was stable and did it made a performance difference.  The
second was emotional: were the users ready to 'trust' an NM program
(5 years ago not everyone wanted NM code yet).  Anyway, it seems that
both of this are true today for QUERY, so...
 
--
Larry Boyd    <[log in to unmask]>
"Talk is cheap because supply is high and demand is low."
  - Someone who knows what they're talking about
(BTW, These are my personal opinions, not those of HP [unless I point out
otherwise])