Nick, Steve, Cortlandt, et al have said:
>Nick, Steve,
>
>I recall we had some discussion (and warning) of this at the last IPROF but
>I don't recall exactly what was said. Does anyone else?
>
> I seem to recall INTEREX saying they needed to reduce costs but this may
>prove to be a false economy to some.
>
>- Cortlandt
>
>Nick Demos wrote in article
><[log in to unmask]>...
>> Steve mentions (and laments)the "cropping" of IPROF to 2 1/2 days.
>>
>> I couldn't agree more. IPROF should be at least 4 full days
>> (Wednesday through Saturday) or maybe even five. Much to cover.
>>
>> If you come from the East Coast,you spend almost as much time
>> traveling as meeting for a 2 1/2 day meeting.
>>
I vote for a longer IPROF. Its very difficult to get things scheduled
that don't conflict in such a short time frame. I would encourage
Interex to revisit how they handle IPROF from an expense standpoint
and come up with some creative ways to cut them.
Duane Percox ([log in to unmask] v/650.306.1608 f/650.365.2706)
http://www.qss.com/http://qwebs.qss.com/qwebshttp://qwebs.qss.com/faq3k
