Subject: | |
From: | |
Reply To: | |
Date: | Tue, 23 Jun 1998 09:37:08 -0600 |
Content-Type: | text/plain |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
Keep in mind that the ESC is intended for "non-critical" calls only. A
response time of several hours is reasonable in that situation. For those
who prefer to call, that avenue is still there. There are cases when I
prefer the ESC, because it allows me to describe the problem in detail, in
writing, so I don't have to worry about a dispatcher trying to paraphrase
my description and garbling it in the process.
>>> Craig Vespe <[log in to unmask]> 06/22/98 11:55pm >>>
In a message dated 98-06-22 21:25:34 EDT, [log in to unmask] writes:
<<
I actually placed my first ESC "support call" yesterday (actually, late on
Sunday night) and an engineer was on the phone this morning.
Needless to say, I was quite pleased :) >>
Sorry, but I wouldn't be - maybe this type of casual support works in
non-
mission-critical situations, but there are actual mission-critical
situations.
A doctor needs a file on a patient and doesn't have his chart. "The
system
will be up - Tuesday". Having a human on the other end of the line,
who
can make informed decisions about the seriousness of a situation, is a
joy.
I can't believe people are happy with systems that take twenty/thirty
minutes
to wade through before you get someone who transcribes your
problem and
makes a judgement call based on how you loud yell.
cv
|
|
|