Sounds like you wanted to kill the child processes first,
and it should be added to an operator's checklist.

Although I would have make the same mistake, assuming
killing the parent process would take the child processes 
with it.

BT
NNNN
Tracy Johnson
MSI Schaevitz Sensors 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Scott Swartzell [mailto:[log in to unmask]]
> Sent: Wednesday, July 17, 2002 10:39 AM
> To: Johnson, Tracy
> Cc: [log in to unmask]
> Subject: Re: [HP3000-L] Better way to stop Apache process?
> 
> 
> Tracy,
> 
> Apache was recenly hung up on one of our systems and we ended
> up having to reboot.  Doing abortjob killed the parent process
> but left other processes running.  I wasn't the one who worked   
> on this, so I don't know all of the details.
> 
> Scott
> 
> > 
> > Define 'better'.
> > 
> > BT
> > NNNN
> > Tracy Johnson
> > MSI Schaevitz Sensors 
> > 
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: Scott Swartzell [mailto:[log in to unmask]]
> > 
> > > Subject: [HP3000-L] Better way to stop Apache process?
> > > 
> > > 
> > > Good morning,
> > > 
> > > I think I've seen this here before, but either didn't keep it
> > > or just plain can't find it....
> > > 
> > > Does anyone know of a better way to stop the Apache background
> > > job other than doing 'abortjob?'
> > > 
> > > Thanks,
> > > Scott
> > 
> > * To join/leave the list, search archives, change list settings, *
> > * etc., please visit http://raven.utc.edu/archives/hp3000-l.html *
> > 
> 
> 
> --
> ---------------------------------------------
> Scott Swartzell   IT | Information Technology
>              590-2152
> 9/20 - Mt Antero (14,269') 
> 8 down, 46 to go.........
> 

* To join/leave the list, search archives, change list settings, *
* etc., please visit http://raven.utc.edu/archives/hp3000-l.html *