HP3000-L Archives

September 2000, Week 3

HP3000-L@RAVEN.UTC.EDU

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Cortlandt Wilson <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Date:
Mon, 18 Sep 2000 19:36:50 -0700
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (53 lines)
> In general, I would still go with Perl as the second
> language (after HTML), and Java (for Java Server Pages)
> as the third.

OK, I hear the opinion but why?   What is the reasoning behind
it?

- Cortlandt


-----Original Message-----
From: Glenn Cole [mailto:[log in to unmask]]
Sent: Sunday, September 17, 2000 12:18 PM
To: [log in to unmask]; [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: Trends in Java vs. Python, PHP, Cold Fusion et.
al . (was
Apache vs. Cold Fusion)


Cortlandt writes:

> I can rephrase my initial idea as a question.    If one is
starting
> out today to learn web and e-commerce programning where does
one
> start?   Given a blank slate, what language or languages
does it make
> the most sense to learn first?    Obviously, first some
HTML.    I
> propose that Java has become or most likely will become a
very good
> second.   Sort of like, but probably to a lesser degree,  a
business
> programmer knowing COBOL.

In general, I would still go with Perl as the second language
(after HTML),
and Java (for Java Server Pages) as the third.

On the e3000, though, it's not as clear, since -- unless I
missed an
announcement somewhere -- Perl cannot access an Image database
(at least,
not through the standard DBI/DBD interface).  In this case,
there are several
choices, though Java may be best for future career growth, and
it would
allow the use of JSP.

Just my opinion, of course. :)

--Glenn

ATOM RSS1 RSS2