HP3000-L Archives

May 2000, Week 3

HP3000-L@RAVEN.UTC.EDU

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Chuck Ryan <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Chuck Ryan <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Fri, 19 May 2000 14:57:40 -0500
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (30 lines)
It sounds awful close to the definition of 'price fixing' to me. Isn't that
one of the things the DOJ went after MS for?

The comment from the 3000 Marketing Manager, about if they let everyone
compete on price then they would not support the customer, is VERY
interesting. This attitude may force me to reevaluate some of HP's policies
I had not looked at too closely before.

This is a very interesting article, definitely worth reading.


The above comments are my own.. not my employer's... etc..



-----Original Message-----
From: Graham, Robert [mailto:[log in to unmask]]
Sent: Friday, May 19, 2000 2:07 PM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: HP pricing


I would like refer everyone to the front page article "Sales pass through
compliance scrutiny" in the April 2000 issue of "The 3000 News Wire" for
another take on HP and their distribution/pricing/VAR policies.  I'll make
no further editorial comment other than what I have to say in that article.

Bob Graham
Director of AMISYS Computing Support

ATOM RSS1 RSS2