Jeff Kell writes:

>But on the "micro-management" issue... I'd much prefer ONE variable >with all clock information you could substring from as opposed to the >growing number of possible individual date/time/etc variables.

That would be my strong vote, too. The string would contain
CCYYMMDDHHMMSSMMM (where the last three MMM's are milliseconds). However
I would be prone to name it something other than HPYYMMDDHHMMSSMMM.
Perhaps just HPTIME.

Wirt Atmar