In article <[log in to unmask]>, [log in to unmask]
says...
>
>> Yes, I remember the Anaheim Conference beinbg excellent also (like
>> the Toronto).  Funny thing, one of the few negatives at Anaheim was
>> the long lines for food (and shortage of food) at the first social -
>> believe it ir not, there were two socials then.  Now if you want to talk
>> aboubt the best socials, you can't beat the Washington '85 conference.  Do
>> you sense a little pride of ownershp??
>
 
Actually, i believe the detroit conference was the best.  Even if you
did not get on the killer yacht party,  there was so..so.. much excitement
bout PA RISC, which was the theme of the conference.  there were
hundreds of h.p. people there,including Biernbaum (who did the KeyNote)
and 5 top executives.  That conference set HP off from the crowd and is
responsible for their bottom line today (well, not the conference but
the new {at that time} Tech.).
 
>Nick is absolutely correct!  You guys in DC did an excellent job on the
>conference, especially considering it was almost moved.  I remember Nick
>and Sam, as well as many others, being very concerned that each and every
>attendee was happy, because it was 'their' conference and they wanted to
>be pride of it.
 
That's why i started the thread "Sucky INTEREX party" .  INTEREX
*should* manage the event, *but* they should get the RUG involved....
 
jerry
ttfn
 
--
Former Hughes Aircraft employee, NOW  \\|//  an Outsourcee 4 CSC
+-----------------------+My opinions  |O-O|  are JUST THAT !!!
| Jerry Bostick         +----------oOO-(_)-OOo-----------------+
| Computer Systems Engineer Specialist, Senior                 |
| Computer Sciences Corp.  work tel.:   714 441-6975           |
| PO Box 3310              work fax.:   714 732-2070           |
| Fullerton, Ca. 92635   work-e-mail: [log in to unmask] |
| USA                    home-e-mail: [log in to unmask]   |
|             *HOME PAGE*: http://www.earthlink.net/~jbostick  |
+--------------------------------------------------------------+