HP3000-L Archives

October 2000, Week 2

HP3000-L@RAVEN.UTC.EDU

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Wirt Atmar <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Date:
Mon, 9 Oct 2000 16:47:00 EDT
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (112 lines)
Based on Ron's and Bruce's comments, I decided not to link to this story. 
Rather, I just lifted it whole hog off of ABC's website and refuse to give 
them any attribution at all. Nonetheless, I thought that you might enjoy it, 
given that the same email has shown up here several times before.

Wirt Atmar

=======================================

By Brian Hartman & David Morgan

N E W  Y O R K, Oct. 9 — An old Internet hoax has found a few more dupes, 
this time making its way into a debate between New York Senate candidates 
Rick Lazio and Hillary Rodham Clinton. 

     “I’d like to ask you how you stand on federal bill 602P,” moderator 
Marcia Kramer, a correspondent for WCBS-TV, told the two rivals. 

     Mrs. Clinton shrugged her shoulders and looked puzzled. “I have no idea 
what it is,” the first lady said. 

     Kramer offered to explain, saying “under the bill that’s now before 
Congress, the U.S. Postal Service will bill e-mail users 5 cents for each 
e-mail they send even though the post office provides no service.”

     “Based on your description, I wouldn’t vote for that bill,” Mrs. 
Clinton said. 

     “I am absolutely opposed to this,” Lazio said. “This is an example of 
the government’s greedy hand in trying to take money from taxpayers that it 
has no right to.”

     But right down to the bill number, the story is a hoax. It spread like 
wildfire last year, prompting a flood of consumer complaints to Congress, the 
Postal Service and the Federal Communication Commission, which also was 
falsely rumored to be considering an e-mail tax. 

     In May 1999, the USPS released a statement calling the 602P story a 
“completely false rumor that is being circulated on Internet e-mail.” 

     “The e-mail message claims that a ‘Congressman Schnell’ has introduced 
‘Bill 602P’ to allow the federal government to impose a 5-cent surcharge on 
each e-mail message delivered over the Internet. The money would be collected 
by Internet Service Providers and then turned over to the Postal Service,” 
the statement says.

     There is no Congressman Schnell. Dozens of real members of Congress 
released statements denying the existence of the bill and asking voters to be 
more vigilant. 

=======================================

 The E-Mail That Started It All 

Following is the text of a widely circulated e-mail that falsely claimed the 
government was planning to tax Internet e-mail.

VOTE NO ON Bill 602P!!!!

     I guess the warnings were true. Federal Bill 602P 5-cents per E-mail 
Sent. It figures! No more free E-mail!

     We knew this was coming!! Bill 602P will permit the Federal Government 
to charge a 5-cent charge on every delivered E-mail.

     Please read the following carefully if you intend to stay online, and 
continue using E-mail. The last few months have revealed an alarming trend in 
the Government of the United States attempting to quietly push through 
legislation that will affect our use of the Internet.

     Under proposed legislation, the US Postal Service will be attempting to 
bill E-mail users out of “alternative postage fees.”

     Bill 602P will permit the Federal Government to charge a 5-cent 
surcharge on every E-mail delivered, by billing Internet Service Providers at 
source. The consumer would then be billed in turn by the ISP.

     Washington DC lawyer Richard Stepp is working without pay to prevent 
this l legislation from becoming law. The US Postal Service is claiming lost 
revenue, due to the proliferation of E-mail, is costing nearly $230,000,000 
in revenue per year. You may have noticed their recent ad campaign: “There is 
nothing like a letter.”

     Since the average person received about 10 pieces of E-mail per day in 
1998, the cost of the typical individual would be an additional 50 cents a 
day—or over $180 per year—above and beyond their regular Internet costs. 
Note that this would be money paid directly to the US Postal Service for a 
service they do not even provide.

     The whole point of the Internet is democracy and noninterference. You 
are already paying an exorbitant price for snail mail because of bureaucratic 
efficiency. It currently takes up to 6 days for a letter to be delivered from 
coast to coast. If the US Postal Service is allowed to tinker with E-mail, it 
will mark the end of the “free” Internet in the United States.

     Our congressional representative, Tony Schnell (R) has even suggested a 
“$20-$40 per month surcharge on all Internet service” above and beyond the 
governments proposed E-mail charges. Note that most of the major newspapers 
have ignored the story—the only exception being the Washingtonian—which 
called the idea of E-mail surcharge “a useful concept who’s time has come” 
(March 6th, 1999 Editorial).

     Do not sit by and watch your freedom erode away! Send this to E-mail to 
EVERYONE on your list, and tell all your friends and relatives write their 
congressional representative and say “NO” to Bill 602P. It will only take a 
few moments of your time and could very well be instrumental in killing a 
bill we do not want. 

     Please forward! 
 
========================================

ATOM RSS1 RSS2